WEIGHT: 61 kg
Services: Ass licking, Pole Dancing, Sex oral without condom, Pole Dancing, Travel Companion
Only moments before King Lear plunges into madness, he asks the crucial question that drives William Shakespeare's play King Lear: In this paper, I will complicate Lear's centuries-old question by examining the process by which he arrives at this point of identity confusion.
In the beginning of the play, Lear renounces the identities that currently define his selfhood: In order to "unburden'd crawl toward death" 1. Yet rather than make a complete shift, Lear clings to the authority that his kingship and fatherhood grant him.
He attempts to simultaneously occupy the contradictory identities of father and infant, and of king and subject. Therefore, while Lear's question of selfhood can be read as originating from a loss of identity, I argue that Lear actually suffers from the reverse—an inundation, or "superflux" of identity, to employ a term from Margreta de Grazia While de Grazia uses superflux to describe the play's excessive materiality in terms of Lear's physical possessions, I believe this notion of overwhelming and disruptive excess can also be applied to the abstract; specifically, Lear's multiple identities.
Lastly, I propose that Lear descends into a mental state of chaotic disorder because this superflux disrupts the natural order of the play world. In This Great Stage: Heilman defines the natural order of King Lear as an "informing principle" by which the play world is organized into "a desirable and permanent order of things" According to Heilman, the natural order functions through the maintenance of "set relationships, duties, obligations and sanctions" I argue that in the monarchical country in Lear , "set relationships" must necessarily include the king-subject relationship and the father-infant relationship.
To be a king, one cannot be a subject, and to be a father, one cannot be an infant. There is also an implicit interdependence in these relationships that the superflux threatens.